illegal arrest and fraudulent concealment of records in Connecticut Superior Court

The Plaintiff was deemed mentally incompetent by the State of Connecticut on November 13, 2008 at a maxiumim mental health level of a 5. On July 30, 2009 the Plaintiff was deemed so severely mentally incompetent by that State of Connecticut that the Plaintiff was stripped of his Constitutional right to refuse psychatric mendication and was ordered by the State of Connecticut to be injected forcefully against the Plaintiff’s will with involuntary medication. The Plaintiff filed numerous lawsuits in both the State and Federal Court pertaining to the issues and set of facts within in which were dismissed. If any person suffers from any kind of mental impairment and enters a legal court transaction the party (in this particular matter the Plaintiff) can void the transaction and or lawsuits filed / ruled upon because his mental impairment prevented him from understanding the nature and consequences of the transaction and the fact that both the other party knew exact details of the Plaintiff’s mental impairment. Therefore as a result on or before September 27, 2011 when the Plaintiff was finally deemed competent by a clinical psychologist outside the State of Connecticut and any and all civil matters before the date of September 27, 2011 must be void and stricken from record as the Plaintiff was deemed mentally incompetent by the State of Connecticut when the Plaintiff pursued the matter civilly.
     The Plaintiff falls under no Statute of Limitations pertaining to this matter and the facts set within. The State of Connecticut has admitted to Fradulently Concealing records and documents as well as continuing their illegal course of conduct until the present day of October 28, 2012. As a result by Connecticut General Statute §52-595 Equitable Tolling, and the Continuing Course of Conduct rule the matter, complaint, and set of facts within this complaint are tolled by the Statute of Limitations in both State and Federal Court.

      On May 2, 2008 the Plaintiff was arrested legally with probable cause by the Newington Police Department for six (6) criminal charges including C.G.S. 53a-62 Threatening 2nd Degree, C.G.S 53a-61 Assault 3rdDegree, C.G.S 53a-182 Disorderly Conduct: Fight with Danger Instrument with Serious Injury, C.G.S 53a-95 Unlawful Restraint 1stDegree, P.A.07-123AAC Strangulation 1stDegree, C.G.S 53a-117 Criminal Mischief 3rdDegree. The six (6) criminal charges were placed under Docket H15N-CR08-0240647-S by the New Britain Superior Court and placed with a $75,000.00 bond. The Newington Police Department Officers responsible for the police investigation and arrest regarding the six (6) mentioned criminal charges against the Plaintiff were, Richard Milhall, Arkadiusz Petlik, Jeanine Allin, John Zematis, Ralph Charter, Paul Camara, and Timothy Buggee.  The New Britain Superior Court Judge Joan Alexander presided over this Docket and was responsible for the warrant against the Plaintiff.  Scott Murphy was the Judicial District of New Britain State’s Attorney presiding over this Docket and was responsible for the warrant against the Plaintiff.

       The Plaintiff on May 5, 2008 was transported from the New Britain Superior Court to Hartford Correctional Center. On May 27, 2008 the Plaintiff bonded out of the six (6) criminal charges by the Newington Police Department for $75,000.00 dollar bond using Abailable Bail Bonds LLC and Norman Landry who is licensed and insured by the State of Connecticut.

      On May 29, 2008 the Plaintiff proceeded to the New Britain Superior Court to a court hearing regarding the Newington Police Department’s six (6) criminal charges under Docket No. H15N-CR08-0240647-S in front of Judge Joan Alexander and Scott Murphy. Judge Joan Alexander on May 29, 2008 during the court hearing on record stated to the Plaintiff that he had two (2) sets of warrants; one from the Probation Department for a Violation of Probation and two a set of charges from the Newington Police Department. On May 29, 2008 the Plaintiff was served and processed by the Probation Department for a Violation of Probation and given a $10,000.00 dollar bond under Docket H15-CR06-0226365-S. On May 29, 2008 the Plaintiff was served and processed by Newington Police Department Officer Arkadiusz Petlik for six (6) criminal charges including C.G.S. 53a-62 Threatening 2nd Degree, C.G.S 53a-61 Assault 3rdDegree, C.G.S 53a-182 Disorderly Conduct: Fight with Danger Instrument with Serious Injury, C.G.S 53a-95 Unlawful Restraint 1stDegree, P.A.07-123AAC Strangulation 1stDegree, C.G.S 53a-117 Criminal Mischief 3rdDegree and attached with a police report pertaining to an incident on May 2, 2008 that the Plaintiff was already arrested for including the same identical illegal criminal charges. The six (6) criminal charges were placed under Docket H15N-CR08-0240647-S by the New Britain Superior Court and placed with a $75,000.00 bond. The Newington Police Department Officers responsible for the police investigation and arrest regarding the six (6) mentioned criminal charges against the Plaintiff were, Richard Milhall, Arkadiusz Petlik, Jeanine Allin, John Zematis, Ralph Charter, Paul Camara, and Timothy Buggee.  The New Britain Superior Court Judge Joan Alexander presided over this Docket and was responsible for the warrant against the Plaintiff.  Scott Murphy was the Judicial District of New Britain State’s Attorney presiding over this Docket and was responsible for the warrant against the Plaintiff.

      The Plaintiff was then transported from New Britain Superior Court to Hartford Correctional Center. On May 30, 2008 the Plaintiff bonded out of both the $10,000.00 bond for a Violation of Probation and the illegal $75,000.00 bond for the illegal set of six (6) criminal charges by the Newington Police Department using 3D-Bail Bonds LLC.

       On June 2, 2008 the Plaintiff proceeded to the New Britain Superior Court to go to an arranigment regarding both the set of six (6) illegal charges by the Newington Police Department. At the New Britain Superior Court Criminal Clerk’s Office the Plaintiff spoke to Chief Deputy Clerk Ralph Dagostine. Ralph Dagostine advised the Plaintiff that he did not have to go to arraginment because he personally took the clerical error bond and arrest records out of the State’s file. When the Plaintiff asked about how to receive his bond money back that he illegally paid and compensation for being detained illegally in prison on a $75,000.00 dollar bond he advised the Plaintiff to hire an attorney. The same day on June 2, 2008 the Plaintiff went to the State’s Attorney’s Office in the New Britain Superior Court and spoke with Scott Murphy. The Plaintiff advised him that Scott Murphy along with Joan Alexander acted out of the scope of their judicial authority and both of their willing actions fell outside the boundaries of their job description. That their failure to follow simple guidelines of their post is an act which represents their own prejudices and goals. The mere negligence that the Plaintiff was in court at that moment for the identical case and criminal charges that both Alexander and Murphy allowed and were responsible for a warrant charging the Plaintiff for the same criminal charges. The Plaintiff requested an investigation and was denied without reason.

On June 6, 2008, Ralph Dagostine wrote a letter to the Hartford Correctional Center Records Office to Counseler Powers stating, “Please be advised that despite the fact that a surety bond for $75,000 was already posted on 5/27/2008 you accepted an appearance bond regarding the above captioned matter for the same amount on 5/30/2008….The second bond will not be recorded by the Clerk’s Office.” This letter was also sent out to Larry D’Orsi, Cynthia DeGoursey, and Jennifer Burgos. The Plaintiff never received this said letter until February 5, 2009. The State of Connecticut employee Ralph Dagostine admits that he Illegally, Unlawfully, and Fraudulently Concealed the Plaintiff’s arrest and bond records pertaining to the illegal arrest and confinement on May 29, 2008 regarding the set of six (6) criminal charges by the Newington Police Department which is a direct Violation of Sue Process and Equal Protection of Rights under Constitutional Law. To this day of October 28, 2012 the Plaintiff has yet to proceed to arraingment nor any form of resolution in this matter even after countless attempts to just about every governmental official within the realm of the Judicial Department. All parties which were sent this letter where well aware of the illegal act consured by State of Connecticut agent Ralph Dagostine and it was discovered in the next following years that all member listed and sent this letter from Ralph Dagostine played an equal part in the destruction and or concealment of the Plaintiff’s illegal arrest and bond records from May 29, 2008.

      On September 6, 2008 the Newington Police Department Officer Timothy Buggee acted outside the scope of his governmental duty and forged a sworn statement said to be given by the Plaintiff. The illegal sworn statement was a vital piece of evidence that let to the Plaintiff’s arrest for an assault. Timothy Buggee being careless in his illegal activity placed the wrong name as the person given the statement as Jason Klemonski and signed it under the Plaintiff’s name Kevin Klemonski. The case was later nolled and dismissed.

      On October 9, 2008 upon Judge Joan Alexander’s order the Plaintiff was sent back to prison by order of the revocation of the Plaintiff’s bonds. The Plaintiff was then transported on October 9, 2008 to Hartford Correctional Center. On October 9, 2008 and October 17, 2008 the Plaintiff was seen by the State of Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care and evauluated on both occasssions to be diagnoised without suffering from any form of mental illness. The Plaintiff on both occasions was given the lowest possible mental health score the State of Connecticut offers of a Mental Health Classification Health Summary Level 1.

      On November 12, 2008 the Plaintiff was called down to the Hartford Correctional Center Records Officer Supervisor Counselor Powers Office. Powers then proceeded to threaten the Plaintiff to stop pursuing his due process claim and resolution regarding the Plaintiff’s illegal arrest on May 29, 2008. Powers stated very clearly that if the Plaintiff did not stop pursuing the matter he would then receive forms of retaliation against him by the State of Connecticut Department of Correction Officers. That same day on November 12, 2008 the Plaintiff’s Attorney Ryan Buasch met him through a legal visit and recorded the threat from Powers.

       On November 13, 2008 upon a referral by Powers to the State of Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care Mental Health Staff, Powers stated that the Plaintiff was delusional concerning his illegal arrest on May 29, 2008 and as a result the Plaintiff was escorted without his property to the Mental Health Department within the Hartford Correctional Center. Powers proceeded with this illegal action to cause intentional harm onto the Plaintiff as a form of retaliation for continuing his due process regarding his illegal arrest on May 29, 2008 and the destruction of said documents. It was there that the Plaintiff met with two State of Connecticut medical professinals including Gina Higgins and Sally Cunningham. It was within this meeting that both Gina Higgins and Sally Cunningham violated the Federally Protected Medical Provisions of HIPPA and contacted the Plaintiff’s family members obtaining and disclosing medical information without the Plaintiff’s consent. It was also within this meeting that the Plaintiff was labeled mentally incompetant at the highest mental health classification of a 5 by Gina Higgins and Sally Cunningham. During the mental incompetacny diagnoises the Plaintiff was denied due process during his medical incompetency evaluation that he did not know at the time was proceeding. The Plaintiff was not allowed to have his lawyer present, an advocate was not assigned to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was not allowed to present evidence or witnesses, nor was the Plaintiff allowed to cross examine the State of Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care’s evidence or witnesses to fulfill his due process and have a fair / just hearing. Procedural Due Process must ensure that the Government utilize fair procedures especially when labeling someone mentally incompetant at the State of Connecticut’s highest level of severity mental health state of mind. Due to the State of Connecticut medical staff violating the Plaintiff’s Due Process of a Fair Hearing with the possibility of the diagnois being overturned the Plaintiff suffered extreme significant hardship including severe mental distress, severe emotional distress, severe defamation of character, medical malpractice, and severe pain and suffering. The Plaintiff as a result of the mental health classification was placed in solitary confinement without his property or legal documents, placed in a suicide gown, deprived of basic elements of hygiene, denied showers, denied a toothbrush, denied eating utensials, denied recreation, and denied any and all access to court or legal documents.

     The State of Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care employees Gina Higgins and Sally Cunningham stated the Plaintiff was severely impaired with an acute chiatric condition and represented a potential danger to self and/or others and are gravely disabled. Higgins and Cunningham stated the Plaintiff was delusional and psychotic in which was diagnoised without the Procedural Due Process as stated in Federal and State Law.

      On February 5, 2009 attorney Eilo Morgan faxed to the Department of Corrections the Plaintiff’s illegal May 29, 2008 bond record and a letter from Ralph Dagostine admitting that he illegally concealed the Plaintiff May 29, 2008 arrest and bond records from the State of Connecticut’s Court Records. As a result the Department of Corrections was forced to respond as to why in fact the Plaintiff was labeled mentally incompetent on the basis he was delusional upon a State of Connecticut official named Powers when she in fact had knowledge the incident was true and factual. State of Connecticut Department of Correction Hartford Correctional Center Deputy Warden Janet Sicilia sent the Plaintiff a two (2) page document. The first one was dated February 27, 2009 stating, “Attached is a copy of a response I sent you. I have a sense you did not receive it because you were transferred to Garner CI around this time.” The second document dated November 13, 2008 the same day the medical staff upon the reccomendation of the Department of Corrections Records Supervisor Powers stated and labeled the Plaintiff mentally incompetant for delusions read, “Unfortunately due to the volume of inmates being process into Harford CC and the limited amount of time between the posting of bonds 5/27 and 5/20 the court nor HCC was aware you posted bond for #H15N-CR08-0240647-S.” Janet Sicilia in turn violated the Plaintiff’s due process by deliberately concealing a crucial outcome of her investigating involving the Plaintiff’s illegal arrest on May 29, 2008. This resulted on the same day of the Plaintiff being labeled mentally incompetant on the basis the Plaintiff was delusional concerning his illegal arrest on May 29, 2008. Janet Siclia intenitionally concealed this crucial piece of documentation to cause intentional harm on the Plaintiff.

       On May 15, 2009 the Plaintiff was assaulted on camera and in front of witnesses by the State of Connecticut Department of Corrections Deputy Warden Anne Cournoyer. Anne Cournoyer did not comply with all federal and state statutes and regulations, administrative and unit directives, department of correction and unit policies and precedures, post orders and lawful orders/ instructions when she not only did not file an incident report but allowed and had part in the destruction of the Department of Corrections video recording system of the assault. If Anne Cournoyer followed the Law and Procedures the recorded footage would have been maintained as evidence. Witness, Isreal Caez contradicted Anne Cournoyer’s sworn statement to the State Police in which he states Anne Cournoyer did in fact assault the Plaintiff and her witnesses were not present at the scene of the crime as she claims. The Department of Corrections found Anne Cournoyer at fault for numerous violations.

       The University of Connecticut Health Care Correctional Managed Health Care Policy and Procedures Number: G 2.07 states “The CDOC or CMHC health professional delivering the treatment will be videotaped speaking with the inmate, explaining the need for and nature of the procedure, and offering the inmate the opportunity to make the treatment unnecessary by ingesting significant amounts of food and fluids. Before the July 30, 2009 Involuntary Medicaition Hearing Dr. Susan Ducate states, “He has now resumed intermittent intake.” The Involunatary Medication Hearing allowed the hearing to continue after the Plaintiff abided by the Policy and Procedures rules and regulations to have the necessicty of the hearing moot.

       On July 30, 2009 before the Involuntary Medication Hearing the Plaintiff was scene by two (2) shifts of medical personnal that recorded that on both occasions the Plaintiff ate fluids and food and in fact was not suffering from delusions.

       On July 30, 2009 the Plaintiff was ordered by State of Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care Dr. Susan Ducate to receive involuntary medication forcefully against his will. The Plaintiff was denied Procedural Due Process because Dr. Susuan Ducate did not follow Federal and State Law by allowing the Plaintiff a fair and just hearing nor a hearing in general in regards to his mental incompetacy involuntary medication. The Plaintiff was not allowed to have his lawyer present, an advocate was not assigned to the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff was not allowed to present evidence or witnesses, nor was the Plaintiff allowed to cross examine the State of Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care’s evidence or witnesses to fulfill his due process and have a fair / just hearing. Procedural Due Process must ensure that the Government utilize fair procedures especially when labeling someone mentally incompetant to receive involuntary medication by stripping the Plaintiff’s Constitutional Right away to refuse medication, at the State of Connecticut’s highest level of severity mental health state of mind. Due to the State of Connecticut medical staff violating the Plaintiff’s Due Process of a Fair Hearing with the possibility of the diagnois and or an order being overturned the Plaintiff suffered extreme significant hardship including severe mental distress, severe emotional distress, severe defamation of character, medical malpractice, and severe pain and suffering. The Plaintiff as a result of the mental health classification was placed in solitary confinement without his property or legal documents, placed in a suicide gown, deprived of basic elements of hygiene, denied showers, denied a toothbrush, denied eating utensials, denied recreation, and denied any and all access to court or legal documents.

       As stated in Administrative Directive 8.8, Psychoactive Medication. 2008 CT Department of Correction, Public Act 07-71-SHB6391,  and Standards for Health Services in Prisons P-I-102.2008. National Commission on Correctional Health Care. Chicago, IL, rules that Dr. Susan Ducate assisted on establishing, the Plaintiff as a legal form of his Due Process the Involuntary Medication Administrative Panel must consist of one (1) non-referring psychiatrist Dr. Daniel Yesu, and one (1) health services staff person Dr. Susan Ducate, and one (1) patient advocate Merry Moriarty. The advocate must give the Plainitff notification of the tentative diagnosis and the factual basis for the diagnosis, and why the staff believes the medicaition is necessary. The inmate, in this matter is the Plaintiff, shall be given the opportunity to attend the full panel proceedings represented by the assigned advocate. The inmate, in this matter the Plainitff and/or advocate shall be allowed to present evidence, including witnesses, and cross examine witnesses. At no time through the Department of Corrections Correctional Managed Health Care records of the Plaintiff on July 30, 2009 does it provide that the Plaintiff or advocate Merry Moriarty provided the Involuntary Medication Panel any form of evidence, witnesses, nor cross-exaimined witnesses. The Plainitff was diened such right by Dr. Susan Ducate when exaimined and the Plainitff’s “advocate” was not present during the hearing. Susuan Ducate in the clinical records states, “He cites regulations, HIPPA violations, laws etc….to present “evidence,” of his innocence and lack of mental problems.” There is no physical evidence presented to the panel in which at the time the Department of Correction and the Plaintiff had possession of. Dr. Susan Ducate states the Plainitff is, “fixated on multiple delisions,” all in which can be proven by the Plaintiff only if he was allowed to present his lawyer Ryan Bousch as his witness and documented evidence to back up all of his statements. Merry Moriarty failed by law to provide the Plaintiff with a mental health board hearing written response to the Plaintiff. She placed 3-1-87 as the date/time it was given to the Plaintiff. Dr. Daniel Yesu, Merry Moriarty, and Dr. Susan Ducate violated the Plaintiff’s due process by having an illegal medical hearing in favor against the Plaintiff which caused him severe physical and mental harm.
     
   On July 30, 2009 after the Ivoluntary Medication Hearing took place at approximately 2:35 p.m. the Plaintiff stated to Dr. Gerard Gangne’ Jr. that Dr. Susan Ducate did not allow the Plaintiff to defend his case. Dr. Gangne’ Jr. refused to investigate the illegal allegation the Plaintiff claimed and continued to state the Plainitff was delusional.

       On a daily basis as a result of the illegal order of Dr. Susan Ducate, the Plaintiff would be handcuffed by a Correctional Officer. Six Correctional Officers would then escort the Plaintiff to a holding cell where each Correctional Officer would restrain the Plaintiff from moving, strip his pants off until the Plaintiff was physically exposed, and allow a Correctional Manged Health Care Medical Professinal inject the Plaintiff with a mind altering stimulant of a high dosage of a psychatric medication called Risperadal with a needle in his buttocks. As a result of the medication forcefully induced against the Plaintiff’s will the Plaintiff sustained the following side effects: drowsiness, fatigue, insomnia, agitation, increased salivation, anxiety, abdominal pain, nausea, dizziness, constipation, muscle pain, weight gain, dry skin, fever, confusion, memory loss, and severe migrains.

       The Plaintiff was recorded by the medical personal from July 30, 2009 through August 3, 2009 to not be suffering from delusions in any form and coorperative with the Department of Corrections staff in every way.

        On July 30, 2009 the Plaintiff was deemed so mentally incompetant that he was stripped of his right to refuse medication. On September 3, 2009 Dr. Craig Burns allowed the Plaintiff the right to take and refuse the medication Klonopin contradicting the Involuntary Medication Hearing Panel’s final medical decision.

       On July 30, 2009 the Plaintiff was deemed so mentally incompetent that he was stripped of his right to refuse medication. On October 2, 2009 Dr. Tie while working under the Connecticut Correctional Managed Health Care in Garner Correctional Institution allowed the Plaintiff the right to take and refuse the medication Vistaril contradicting the Involuntary Medication Hearing Panel’s final medical decision. Dr. Tie also illegally signed his name as a witness and as also physician to treat such medication which is illegal by Connecticut Law and constitutes medical mal-practice. , “Patient not scene. Spoke with AAG Motherway-Discussed inmate with her. Expressed this writer’s view that patient is manipulative and uses maladaptive means of obtaining what he wants.” Carmel Motherway is the Connecticut appointed attorney for UConn Medical Health Center  which the Plaintiff had suit against, and such record of their discussion was placed in the Plaintiff’s medical clinical record.

       On November 4, 2009 Dr. Karen Tie the Plaintiff’s medical doctor contacted Assistant Attorney General Carmel Motherway without any form of consent from the Plaintiff nor HIPPA waiver signed by the Plaintiff in which Dr. Karen Tie illegally disclosed and obtained medical information concerning the Plaintiff from Carmel Motherway to determine a medical diagnosis. Dr. Tie states the following at 9:50 am

       While the Plaintiff was labeled by the State of Connecticut to be at the highest level of severity of mental incompetency and ordered induced involuntary medication the Plaintiff filed numerous lawsuits against State and Governmental Officials. The State of Connecticut appointed Assistant Attorney General Carmel Motherway to represent the State of Connecticut and it’s Officials. Attorney Carmel Motherway was well aware that the Plaintiff was mentally incompetant and was even stripped of his right to refuse medication. However, Attorney Carmel Motherway illegally forced the Plaintiff to sign withdrawal’s from six (6) lawsuits against the State. Motherway knew that a mentally ill person can not sign a legal document binding with the court. She proceeded to do this illegal action to have the State maintain a financial gain and for her own personal gain. This was a direct Violation of the Plaintiff Procedural Due Process, Equal Protection of Rights, Obtruction to Access to Court, Violation of Persons with Disabilities, and a Violation of the Attorney’s Code of Ethics. Motherway’s illegal actions were intentional to cause harm and damage against the Plaintiff.

      In order for a State of Connecticut citizen to sue the State of Connecticut and its employees the State of Connecticut Claims Commissioner must waive sovereign immunity and grant the said person permission to sue in a Superior Court. A $50.00 filing fee must be submitted with the complaint and or claim in order to have a hearing regarding the matter with the Claims Commissioner. If a person does not have the funds to pay the $50.00 filing fee an application of waiver fees must be submitted. If the person is found indigent by State Law the State must personal pay the filing fee out of pocket. On May 26, 2010 the State of Connecticut Claims Commissioner James R. Smith refused to abide by the State of Connecticut and Federal Law that states no person shall be denied access to court due to the inability to pay court filing fees and or anyother related court fee. On May 26, 2010 James R. Smith denied the Plaintiff’s application of waiver fees not because the Plaintiff had means to pay because he did not but James R. Smith denied the Plaintiff his application of waiver fees and any future application of waiver fees due to only personal reasons not supported by law. This was a direct violation of the Plaintiff’s Due Process and the Plaintiff suffered a severe amount of pain and damage as a result.

      On or before June 17, 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Corrections Warden Scott Semple violated State and Federal Law by intentionally obstructing the Plaintiff’s access to court and due process by holding and removing the contents of Legal Documents the Plaintiff sent and addressed to the court. Scott Semple then returned said outgoing and incoming mail illegally opening said envelopes, removing all of the legal documents held inside for personal use, wrote DENIED on the letter of the out-going mail to the courts, and after a months time gave the empty envelopes back to the Plaintiff in a garbage bag. As a result the Plaintiff missed court deadlines and cases were dismissed in which the Plaintiff suffered siginificant pain and damage as a result.

      On or before June 28, 2010 the State of Connecticut Department of Corrections Warden Scott Semple violated the Plaintiff’s Due Process by suspending the Plaintiff ability to file a Grievance against the State of Connecticut Officials and or Employees.

       On or before July 8, 2010 the Department of Corrections Supervisor Stowell and the Assistant Attorney General Carmel Motherway while representing the State of Connecticut against the Plaintiff obstructed the Plaintiff’s Access to Court, Violated the Plaintiff’s Due Process and Equal Protection of Rights by denying the Plaintiff his right by Federal and State Law to allow him Legal Copies an Legal Calls. The Plaintiff suffered siginificant pain and damage as a result.

       On Decemeber 19, 2011 the Plaintiff filed a complaint against Judge Joan Alexander with the Judicial Review Council concerning the fact that Judge Alexander and Scott Murpy illegal had the Plaintiff arrested and confined when they were both well aware of their illegal activity. On January 18, 2012 Judge Joan Alexander, a member of the Judicial Review Council did not notify the Plaintiff that she was a member of such council and to add Judge Alexander did not remove herself from such council when dismissing the Plaintiff’s complaint due to the complaint being time barred, even though the Plaintiff presented Fraudulent Concealment protected by no Statute of Limitations. Scott Murphy the State’s Attorney responsible as well for the Plaintiff’s illegal May 29, 2008 arrest is the Executive Director of the Judicial Review Council and did not remove himself when signing off on the dimissal of Judge Joan Alexander’s Complaint. This is a direct conflict of interst and a violation of the Plaintiff’s Procedual Due Process.

      On June 25, 2012 after the State of Connecticut stated they completed their investigation regarding a complaint against bail bondsman Norman Landry pertaining to the illegal arrest of the Plaintiff on May 29, 2008 the State of Connecticut stated, “It is evident that a clerical error occurred within the Judicial Department.”

      The Plaintiff is disabled and receives $839.00 each month from Social Security Disability since January 2012. Since January 2012 the Plaintiff’s income has not changed and daily his debt increases due to his medical injuries and facial reconstructive surgeries/treatment. Since January 2012 the Connecticut Superior Court has Granted all Superior Court Application of Waiver Fees due to the Plaintiff Indegencey including up to the date of September 21, 2012 in which was Granted by Judge James Abrams. Judge James Abrams on October 5, 2012 denied the Plaintiff’s Application of Wavier Fees contradicting 10 months of Granted Application of Waiver Fees including his own for reasons stating the Plaintiff had money two (2) years ago so the Plainitff is not indigent now. Judge James Abrams then denied the Plaintiff an Application of Waiver Fees once more on October 9, 2012 for the same reason all in which violate Connecticut General Statute §52-259(b) and Constitutional Right to access to court. Judge James Abrams acted illegally once more by denying an Application of Wavier Fees for a Civil Complaint against himself for the same reason that the Plaintiff had access to money two years prior so he must have access with can not be proven to fianical means to pay court related fees in this present day of October 28, 2012. James Abrams acted out of the scope of their judicial authority and both of their willing actions fell outside the boundaries of their job description. That his failure to follow simple guidelines of their post is an act which represents their own prejudices and goals. The mere negligence and disregard to not only the Plaintiff’s civil right but law is James Abrams personal action for the State of Connecticut and his own personal gain.  

      The Plaintiff is disabled and receives $839.00 each month from Social Security Disability since January 2012. Since January 2012 the Plaintiff’s income has not changed and daily his debt increases due to his medical injuries and facial reconstructive surgeries/treatment. Since January 2012 the Connecticut Superior Court has Granted all Superior Court Application of Waiver Fees due to the Plaintiff Indegencey including up to the date of September 21, 2012 in which was Granted by Judge Antonio Robaiana. Judge Antonio Robaina on October 11, 2012 and October 19, 2012 denied the Plaintiff’s Application of Wavier Fees contradicting 10 months of Granted Application of Waiver Fees including his own for reasons stating the Plaintiff had money two (2) years ago so the Plainitff is not indigent now. Judge Antonio Robaina reasons for claiming the Plaintff was able to pay was due to a New Britain Superior Court Judge James Abrams ruling a week previous citing “Macellaio vs. Kavroudakis Complaint. The only way Judge Robanina would know of such ruling and case is if he had direct ocntact with New Britain Superior Court and conspirasied simotanousley with Judge James Abrams in which such decision is not supported by law. Judge Antonio Robaina violated Connecticut General Statute §52-259(b) and Constitutional Right to access to court. Judge Antonio Robaina acted illegally once more by denying an Application of Wavier Fees for a Civil Complaint against himself for the same reason that the Plaintiff had access to money two years prior so he must have access with can not be proven to fianical means to pay court related fees in this present day of October 28, 2012. Antoino Robaina acted out of the scope of their judicial authority and both of their willing actions fell outside the boundaries of their job description. That his failure to follow simple guidelines of their post is an act which represents their own prejudices and goals. The mere negligence and disregard to not only the Plaintiff’s civil right but law is Antonio Robaina personal action for the State of Connecticut and his own personal gain.  

On November 27, 2012 the Connecticut State Police Major Crime Unit got a warrant for Chief Deputy Clerk Ralph Dagostine's work computer within the New Britain Superior Court. It was here the Detectives discovered an email from Dagostine to Larry D'Orsi the Supervisor of Criminal Records explaining that the DOC failed to provide them with the bond in doing so the Plaintiff was illegally incarcerated and held on a $75,000 bond. When the Detectives questioned why this information was not provided to the courts or any investigative officer Dagostine replied my supervisors advised me to keep all this information NON-Disclosed to anyone including the Plaintiff.....I can be reached on my email macellaiobrooklyn@yahoo.com, I have also all documents to back up each statement taken from the Connecticut State Police Major Crime Unit's Investigation.